Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 20(11)2023 May 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20235426

RESUMEN

Ovarian Cancer (OC) diagnosis is entrusted to CA125 and HE4. Since the latter has been found increased in COVID-19 patients, in this study, we aimed to evaluate the influence of SARS-CoV-2 infection on OC biomarkers. HE4 values above the cut-off were observed in 65% of OC patients and in 48% of SARS-CoV-2-positive patients (not oncologic patients), whereas CA125 values above the cut-off were observed in 71% of OC patients and in 11% of SARS-CoV-2 patients. Hence, by dividing the HE4 levels into quartiles, we can state that altered levels of HE4 in COVID-19 patients were mostly detectable in quartile I (151-300 pmol/L), while altered levels in OC patients were mostly clustered in quartile III (>600, pmol/L). In light of these observations, in order to better discriminate women with ovarian cancer versus those with COVID-19, we established a possible HE4 cut-off of 328 pmol/L by means of a ROC curve. These results demonstrate that the reliability of HE4 as a biomarker in ovarian cancer remains unchanged, despite COVID-19 interference; moreover, it is important for a proper diagnosis that whether the patient has a recent history of SARS-CoV-2 infection is determined.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias Ováricas , Humanos , Femenino , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Proteína 2 de Dominio del Núcleo de Cuatro Disulfuros WAP , COVID-19/diagnóstico , SARS-CoV-2 , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico , Curva ROC
2.
J Immunol Methods ; 518: 113486, 2023 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2308533

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The 2019 coronavirus (COVID-19) epidemic, required the development of different diagnostic tests. While reverse transcriptase real-time PCR (RT-PCR) remains the first-line test of choice in acute infection diagnosis, anti-N antibodies serological assays provide a valuable tool to differentiate natural SARS-CoV-2 immunological response from that induced by vaccination, thus the goal of our study was to evaluate three serological tests agreement for these antibodies detection. METHODS: Three anti-N different tests were examined in 74 sera from patients referred or not COVID infection: immunochromatographic rapid test (Panbio™ COVID-19 IgG/IgM Rapid Test Device Abbott, Germany), ELISA kit (NovaLisa® SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM NovaTech Immunodiagnostic GmbH, Germany) and ECLIA immunoassay (Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Roche Diagnostics, Manheim, Germany). RESULTS: Qualitative comparison of the three analytical methods revealed a moderate agreement between ECLIA immunoassay and immunochromatographic rapid test (Cohen kappa coefficient κ = 0.564). Correlation analysis indicated weak positive correlation between total Ig (IgT) detected by ECLIA immunoassay and IgG by ELISA test (p < 0.0001), the analysis of ECLIA IgT and IgM ELISA detected, showed no statistical correlation. CONCLUSION: Comparison between of three analytical systems available for anti-N SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM antibodies showed a general agreement when compared to detect total and G class immunoglobulins, while doubtful or discordant results have been highlighted for IgT and IgM class. Anyway, all the tests examined provide reliable results to assess the serological status of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Humanos , Anticuerpos/inmunología
3.
Microbes Infect ; 24(6-7): 104976, 2022 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1773645

RESUMEN

One of the most urgent needs worldwide is to vaccinate against SARS-CoV-2 as many people as possible. We evaluated humoral response to Comirnaty vaccine in Thalassemia Major patients (TM). We measured SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies against Spike protein in 57 TM patients and 58 healthy blood donors (HBD). TM and HBD subjects revealed a homogeneous serological response to the Comirnaty (Mean ± SD; TM = 1917,21 ± 1384,49; HBD = 2039,81 ± 1064,44; p = 0,5884). No statistically significant differences were observed among two groups. Interestingly, we observed in 73.3% of asplenic patients Ab-S titres above 800 BAU, whereas only in 26% of non splenectomized patients showed Ab-S titres above 800 BAU). This differences were statistically significant p < 0.039. Further measurement on other Ab types was needed for better understanding humoral response to Comirnaty.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas Virales , Talasemia beta , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Vacuna BNT162 , COVID-19/prevención & control , Humanos , Inmunidad Humoral , ARN Viral , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/genética , Vacunación , Vacunas Sintéticas , Vacunas de ARNm
4.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 18(13)2021 06 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1389368

RESUMEN

We read with great interest the paper by Gaudio and colleagues on vitamin D and on the state of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) at the time of admission [...].


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Hospitales , Humanos , Salud Pública , Vitamina D
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA